From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 04:19:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820B216A419 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp224.math.arizona.edu (smtp224.math.arizona.edu [128.196.224.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AC313C458 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp224.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDYLJ-0003wU-Rl for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:19:22 -0700 Received: from 71-220-136-74.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.136.74] helo=[192.168.0.3]) by smtp224.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1IDYLJ-0003wL-KC for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:19:21 -0700 Message-ID: <46A6CE7D.5050509@math.arizona.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:15:57 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) Cc: Subject: Re: powerdot X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:19:16 -0000 Nikola Lecic wrote: > > > Nobody thinks that TeXLive shouldn't be ported :) What do you mean by > "light version"? > > One of original arguments for not porting TeXLive was that the program is simply to big (over 1Gb). Having downloaded TeXLive (binaries only) on several occasions for my friends over DSL I can confess that that is really the case (at least 3 hours for binaries over 1.5Mps DSL connection) . I purpose that the program be ported in the style of Gnome. Light strip down version which would be the minimal fully functional configuration, "full" (English language) version with all bells, and then another port with the support for different languages, another port Music part of the TeXLive etc. The idea of dividing the port is just initial and should be more carefully considered by the people who know more about various aspects of TeX that I do not use. Sincerely, Predrag Punosevac