From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 14:00:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E5016B27A for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 14:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9767343DD7 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 14:00:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4E11A4E2D; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F310351450; Wed, 31 May 2006 10:00:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:00:27 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: PauAmma Message-ID: <20060531140027.GA63707@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR ports/76915 fell through the cracks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:01:15 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:49:35AM -0500, PauAmma wrote: > >From the initial PR: >=20 > When /var (or whichever filesystem holds PKG_DBDIR) is mounted noexec, > attempts to deinstall ports will fail and leave a mess behind if the > port has a require or deinstall script. This patch checks for that and > skips deinstalling if that is the case. >=20 > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D76915 for details) >=20 > Is there any interest in that? I can submit a patch against 1.533, but=20 > given the lack of any reaction to the initial patch, I'm not sure whether= =20 > it's worth it. I don't know that it's a worthwhile problem to solve. Kris --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEfaF7Wry0BWjoQKURAkvsAJ9szwGrDUNa6i4UHmyQ81SW1O2MUgCgiCzD VHH+VdY09RmjQjkPRWurqaU= =MjhH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--