From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 20 12:34:01 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C18D106566B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562D68FC17
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <freebsd-current@m.gmane.org>) id 1ObC1E-0004rg-JT
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:33:56 +0200
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:33:56 +0200
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:33:56 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:34:09 +0200
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <i2453b$625$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <AANLkTikZk3AoW9VcP-gPKoU1vrBj22HKlgxWRfRCreir@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikZk3AoW9VcP-gPKoU1vrBj22HKlgxWRfRCreir@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Subject: Re: emt64 performance degradation over amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:34:01 -0000

On 07/18/10 21:21, Fabio Kaminski wrote:

> (note that i cant be too precise , since i didnt go any further with more
> tests... its more a subjective feel (boot time, general use.. etc))

It is probable then that it is only your imagination, and if you are
really serious about this you should make some objective measurements on
directly comparable hardware. http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice