From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 29 05:50:53 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id FAA26800 for current-outgoing; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 05:50:53 -0700 Received: from DATAPLEX.NET (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA26794 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 05:50:52 -0700 Received: from [199.183.109.242] by DATAPLEX.NET with SMTP (MailShare 1.0fc5); Tue, 29 Aug 1995 07:50:29 -0600 X-Sender: rkw@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 07:50:32 -0500 To: current@freebsd.org From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: CTM problems Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I have attempted to keep my copy of the -current tree up-to-date by subscription to the CTM updates. However, even though I am connected always connected to the net, I find that I fail to receive many of the updates and have to go in manually to "fill in the gaps". Are others experiencing the same problem? If so, what is the cause and what can we do to "fix" it. Personally, I prefer CTM to sup because it eliminates some network loading problems. Is there any demand for a CTM distribution of -stable? If so, I would be happy to work on setting it up. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net