From owner-freebsd-smp  Thu Dec  5 15:38:15 1996
Return-Path: <owner-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA12722
          for smp-outgoing; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 15:38:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA12717
          for <smp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 15:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs.utah.edu (cs.utah.edu [128.110.4.21])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id PAA02719
          for <smp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 15:38:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fast.cs.utah.edu by cs.utah.edu (8.8.3/utah-2.21-cs)
	id QAA26654; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 16:36:50 -0700 (MST)
Received: by fast.cs.utah.edu (8.6.10/utah-2.15-leaf)
	id QAA00497; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 16:36:49 -0700
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 16:36:49 -0700
From: vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu (Kevin Van Maren)
Message-Id: <199612052336.QAA00497@fast.cs.utah.edu>
To: smp@csn.net, vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu
Subject: Re: make locking more generic?
Cc: smp@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

My main point is that you wouldn't be limited to 16 IRQ lines.