From owner-cvs-user Sat May 10 01:21:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA25858 for cvs-user-outgoing; Sat, 10 May 1997 01:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA25853; Sat, 10 May 1997 01:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA16058; Sat, 10 May 1997 01:21:40 -0700 (PDT) To: Bruce Evans cc: CVS-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-user@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 May 1997 23:53:41 PDT." <199705100653.XAA21026@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 01:21:40 -0700 Message-ID: <16038.863252500@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-user@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Use `mk' files in share/mk (relative to the top level of the source > tree) instead of the system default ones in /usr/share/mk. This > only works for makes run from the top level, and a few not too out > of date system makefiles must be present to start up. Bootstraps > from can still be done from scratch by giving the path to an up to > date share/mk on the command line. Hmmm. Why I get the creepy feeling that this is another well-intentioned but ultimately annoying change which we're all going to come to regret, me first and foremost? :-) Jordan