From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 12 18:27:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp (waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp [210.226.20.160]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A845437B66C for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 18:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9D1R9G10294 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:27:09 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:27:09 +0900 Message-ID: <7md7h5a5ua.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> From: Jun Kuriyama To: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fragments refused by ipfw In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:31:50 -0400" <20001012143150.C37870@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <7mzokajzvo.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20001012143150.C37870@jade.chc-chimes.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 12) (Channel Islands) (i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:31:50 -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > ipfw: -1 Refuse UDP hostB hostA in via fxp0 Fragment = 925 > > > > I used ipfw with default accept but no rules. I have not seen such > > message before. > > To be perfectly honest I don't see what code path could cause this, if > it hits the default rule we jump out of ipfw right away: Hmm, ipfw_report() seems printed message above is happend with f == NULL condition. But ipfw_report() is called after checking f->fw_flg... Something strange... -- Jun Kuriyama // IMG SRC, Inc. // FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message