Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:02:48 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, Wan-Teh Chang <wtchang@redhat.com>, glennrp@imagemagick.org Subject: Re: Q on nss-3.11 (Re: Does Mozilla trunk build successfully on FreeBSD?) Message-ID: <43CFE258.40702@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200601191341.21740.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <43CEB0D6.3050602@redhat.com> <200601181721.42076.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <43CEC144.5030608@redhat.com> <200601191341.21740.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Hi, Wan-Teh! > > Was the fortcrypt simply removed from the nss-3.11? So it seems, but I wanted > to verify it. > > Also gone are the "instinit" and the "newuser" executables, but the "fipstest" > and the "crmftest" are added. Are these useful to anyone after the build is > finished and verified? > > Gnome, I don't see anything in our ports tree, that depends on the removed > -lswft... Nothing that depends on it directly, but there may be some binaries that link to it, but register a generic nss dependency. That said, I could not find any. Joe - -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDz+JYb2iPiv4Uz4cRAiD4AJ9uyjflqItQ/7DZ/bF3ZS1tXYM/bQCfUqXk 8dlzfLEKzepDr45DBcaldZI= =pUGc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43CFE258.40702>