From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 13 15:24:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831D337B401; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 15:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A7643FA3; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 15:24:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com ([192.168.0.5]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h3DMOuZK010029; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 18:24:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 06:22:01 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Doug Barton Message-Id: <20030414062201.184a0581.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030413145741.S28372@znfgre.tberna.bet> References: <200304082353.h38NrZXM010842@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030412183216.Z43794@freebsdmall.com> <20030413145741.S28372@znfgre.tberna.bet> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: murray@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: brueffer@FreeBSD.org cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en docs.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 22:24:58 -0000 On Sun, 13 Apr 2003 14:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Doug Barton wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Murray Stokely wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 04:53:35PM -0700, Christian Brueffer wrote: > > > Log: > > > s/IPSec/IPsec/ > > > > Please add this spelling in the word list in the Doc Project Primer. > > Both the new and old spelling are different from that listed on the > > O'Reilly word list for authors. > > Do you have a URL for that? And how do they list it? The RFC's have it as > IPSec, IPSEC, and IPsec, with the last being the most popular. Seems like > as long as we're consistent, we're at least in the ballpark. > Personally, last I checked, we were using the `IPSec' spelling in both the sources and in most (if not all) of the documentation. I think it should just stay like that. -- Tom Rhodes