From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Jun 15 09:02:57 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA14992
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 09:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.cs.msu.su (laskavy@redsun.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA14987
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 09:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from laskavy@localhost) by ns.cs.msu.su (8.8.5/8.6.12) id UAA29471; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:02:42 +0400 (DST)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:02:42 +0400 (DST)
Message-Id: <199706151602.UAA29471@ns.cs.msu.su>
From: "Sergei S. Laskavy" <laskavy@cs.msu.su>
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Boot: /etc/rc*: messages: letter case
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello!

I'm using 2.2.2-R and noticed that the boot messages improved.

I have a question related to the messages printed from
/etc/rc* scripts.

Why do we use
	Starting final network daemons:
--------^
but
	starting local daemons:
--------^

Or we have some esoterical reason to start some messages from capital
letter and other from lower case letter and sometimes use "starting",
sometimes just
	additional daemons:
-------^
without "starting": word.

I'm not native English speaker so ... no patches here :(

Sergei S. Laskavy