From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Sep 17 11:14:59 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA01692
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meter.eng.uci.edu (root@meter.eng.uci.edu [128.200.85.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA01680
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newport.ece.uci.edu by meter.eng.uci.edu (8.7.4) id LAA18876; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost by newport.ece.uci.edu (8.7.4) id LAA11730; Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609171814.LAA11730@newport.ece.uci.edu>
To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Object directory changes to make 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Sep 1996 06:15:06 CDT."
             <v02140b00ae6431301283@[208.2.87.4]> 
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:14:51 -0700
From: Steven Wallace <swallace@ece.uci.edu>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> No. Although I support the idea of cleaning up the code, I do not support
> adding anything to the "default" action. It is bad enough that we need to
> support <...>.<machine>, <...>/obj, and <...>/. There is no reason to add
> to that list.

I AM NOT ADDING ANYTHING TO THAT LIST.  NOW GO AND LOOK AT THE CODE
BEFORE YOU SAY ANYTHING MORE.