From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 24 13:47:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from extremis.demon.co.uk (extremis.demon.co.uk [194.222.242.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F852152DD for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:47:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjvc@extremis.demon.co.uk) Received: (qmail 62446 invoked by uid 1010); 24 Jan 2000 21:01:38 -0000 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 21:01:38 +0000 From: George Cox To: Jim Pazarena Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd with wrappers built-in Message-ID: <20000124210138.C62360@extremis.demon.co.uk> References: <10001241002.aa25082@ccstores.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.1i In-Reply-To: <10001241002.aa25082@ccstores.com>; from paz@ccstores.com on Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 10:02:03AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT (i386) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 24/01 10:02, Jim Pazarena wrote: > Can anyone confirm yay/nay if the wrappers which is built-in > to the inetd on 3.4 has the blacklist patch compiled into it? You sound like you mean the RBL "Real-time blackhole list" spam filter. Any filtering inetd does is based on the IP address of the connecting host. It is up to an application level process to filter content. gjvc -- [gjvc] In god we're trussed To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message