From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 14:33:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 93E0D10656AD; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:33:32 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Bruce Cran Message-ID: <20101217143332.GB28086@freebsd.org> References: <20101214093140.00007aad@unknown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101214093140.00007aad@unknown> Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, bf1783@googlemail.com Subject: Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:33:32 -0000 On Tue Dec 14 10, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:47:39 +0000 > "b. f." wrote: > > > The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in > > r212525 as part of his tbemd project merge. It's possible that this > > change may have been an unintended, but it followed a discussion in > > which Warner rejected a related patch proposed by Garrett Cooper, > > partly because sysinstall is included in build-tools in Makefile.inc1, > > even though some thought that it should not be. In any event, you > > should probably look into that before committing the last part of your > > patch. > > I'm wondering if people might be surprised to find sade gone if they > set WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL - one's an installer, the other a partitioning > program. that's a good argument. so WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL mustn't affect sade. cheers. alex > > -- > Bruce Cran -- a13x