From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Feb 27 20:20: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD2537B71C
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:20:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1S4K3T13698;
	Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:20:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:20:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200102280420.f1S4K3T13698@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
Subject: Re: bin/25436: csh "nice" command does not behave in sync with usr.bin/nice 
Reply-To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/25436; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
To: rwatson@freebsd.org
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/25436: csh "nice" command does not behave in sync with usr.bin/nice 
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:10:44 -0800

 > 
 > >Number:         25436
 > >Category:       bin
 > >Synopsis:       csh builtin nice behaves improperly
 > 
 > However, what does worry me is that the csh nice command doesn't appear to
 > work properly, and report errors correctly.
 
 It works, it just doesn't report errors; it throws away the return
 value from setpriority(2).  I can send patches for this, but that
 would mean taking off three or four files off the vendor branch.  Is
 tcsh actively maintained?  If so, where should patches be submitted
 to?  Anyone?
 
 Regards
 
 					Dima Dorfman
 					dima@unixfreak.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message