From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 1 16:12:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E60EB7 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D7C7A9 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:12:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:Content-Type; bh=A/RrHow+VbMW8Y9DghZ4bJStrvT+f3tW/+1TMJU2abI=; b=oqFlYvkiQd/pRb7JOHhxYEaZ+X/6fq/WtzcdRmE7HlnOK6wIuBYSGt4O9+Sg6fugSd12aBg4ZibzeWMcOOeiYKr1WnpWJt8+QyfhmTYBQCnQU4XH1aad8AzId/2+nk2C; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1UBSZi-000OuA-BC; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:12:46 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1362154365-66552-84087/5/4; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:12:45 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com Subject: Re: Limiting jail CPU & memory resources References: <5130BD4D.5000305@a1poweruser.com> <5130CEC9.30005@a1poweruser.com> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:12:44 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5130CEC9.30005@a1poweruser.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.13 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:12:47 -0000 On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:52:41 -0600, wrote: > Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers. > Its experimental and has to be compiled into the kernel. > Need solutions that are provided as part of the base system. > Such as a loadable kernel module. > Can not be risking the security of production jails on some > experimental software. Unfortunately there's nothing else available yet. You'd be better off using full-fledged hypervisors like Xen, KVM, or ESXi. I'm also anxiously awaiting some improvement in this area.