Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:22:42 +0100 From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Cc: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com> Subject: Re: fam Message-ID: <200503190922.43241.freebsd@redesjm.local> In-Reply-To: <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20050319030449.GG4271@freebsdmall.com> <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El S=E1bado, 19 de Marzo de 2005 06:35, Joe Marcus Clarke escribi=F3: > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 19:04 -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > > How important is fam to GNOME. Should we add a commented out entry > > to inetd.conf? Any comment on PR: conf/74004? > > I'll say it's critical to a user-friendly GNOME installation.=20 > Without FAM, you will need to restart gnome-panel each time you > install new software, the GTK+ file chooser doesn't update > dynamically nor does Nautilus (or anything related to the file > system). I can't imagine actually using a GNOME installation without > FAM. > > I think a commented out entry in /etc/inetd.conf would be good. I > think teaching the devel/fam port to create an active entry in > inetd.conf to be better. > If this is desired, an /etc/rc.d/famd would be better. famd can be work=20 in daemon mode without the aids of inetd. And, if we import the new famd from sgi (2.7.0) and the netbsd imon=20 (kqueue based), we can get a great improvement. I've this running at=20 work with freebsd4 and pkgsrc. =2D- josemi=20 > Joe > > > - Murray > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503190922.43241.freebsd>