From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 08:58:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7445A16A4CE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:58:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B9543D2F for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:58:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sander.vesik@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so404640rnf for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:58:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=eCLj0SfUQ7euyXa/4dci9IL3daThj3z6DL6283604vRv5ZJYTkTLcMkqYdKiHaU1w4BqRgV1KkSaCoOnf3CsJuBa97GmATzkqfr6WeBpyJKtP4VKonDMv0qhmeEwH8KeX8mIN6Z0Fh/7l0Ddls8Yt0S/T2QTuBsP1jL09cILMSM= Received: by 10.38.65.76 with SMTP id n76mr142939rna; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.66.46 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:58:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:58:30 +0200 From: Sander Vesik To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1108126229.4084.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <2fd864e05021106537bdcff09@mail.gmail.com> <1108146951.31338.10.camel@hatter.wonderland.dn> <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr> Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sander Vesik List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:58:31 -0000 On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:26:05 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Julio Capote writes: > > > A website like www.spreadfirefox.com aims at targetting firefox to > > regular users that may not get the full "marketing dosage" from > > www.mozilla.org, so why not do the same for freebsd? > > Because FreeBSD is a server, not a desktop. The real market potential > is on the server side. And if you want to convince large organizations > to adopt FreeBSD as a server, you must not present it as a substitute > for Windows desktops, a/k/a "regular users." This is BULLSHIT. Not just any any bullshit either but virulent stinky bullshit - and also coincidentially the best way to dispromote FreeBSD. > -- > Anthony >