From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 06:52:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2B716A4CE; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from box.hayers.net (82-34-128-159.cable.ubr02.gray.blueyonder.co.uk [82.34.128.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1712E43D64; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:52:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Gary@hayers.org) Received: from bart (bart.hayers.net [192.168.0.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by box.hayers.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3EDqu59012610; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:52:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from Gary@hayers.org) Message-Id: <200404141352.i3EDqu59012610@box.hayers.net> From: "Gary Hayers" To: "'Adam Weinberger'" Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:52:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040414132702.GE94922@toxic.magnesium.net> Thread-Index: AcQiJJD+V4pN5bSkR3WaHsJzuwTTsgAAu9wg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2096 X-Virus-Scanned: by Sophos for Unix (http://www.sophos.com) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (1.212.2.1-2004-01-28-exp) on box.hayers.net X-Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 6, autolearn=not spam) cc: 'FreeBSD-Ports' Subject: RE: New port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:52:56 -0000 Adam Weinberger wrote: > Gary - > > I've found that in general, the following things tend to delay the > addition of a new port: > > * Any build errors; committers may test it, get frustrated, and give > up > * Not passing portlint -A > * Use of hardware/devices/programs that very few committers to; we > want to test stuff, especially from new committers > * Many dependencies; this is just a PITA (nothing to be done about > these last two items, really) > * Any bizarre tricks or manoeuvres in the Makefile, created by not > knowing a better way... if you had to guess at anything, check it > against other ports > * Asking when your port will get committed; I stay away from PRs that > generate those requests > * Being seen as encouraging people who whine about the crappy > treatment they received by committers, like we owe the world some > fast response time or something > > Double-check your port. If it has any technical issues, fix them. And > don't feed those who troll. > > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org > adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org > http://www.vectors.cx Thanks Adam, I appreciate all comments on this subject. I am looking forward to becoming more involved with the FreeBSD project. Regards, Gary Hayers System Operator (but not operating a system!) http://www.hayers.org/