From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 10:04:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644201065677 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc@default.co.yu) Received: from smtp1.default.co.yu (anarki.default.co.yu [87.237.201.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D93A38FC26 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc@default.co.yu) Received: (qmail 74232 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2008 09:37:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.5.7.109?) (bc@default.co.yu@213.198.198.156) by smtp1.default.co.yu with SMTP; 24 Apr 2008 09:37:52 -0000 Message-ID: <481054E5.2050201@default.co.yu> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:37:41 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Qm9nZGFuIMSGdWxpYnJr?= Organization: Default Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shaun Amott References: <1206621386.26175.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> <20080330231002.GA16562@charon.picobyte.net> In-Reply-To: <20080330231002.GA16562@charon.picobyte.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Olivier Mueller , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ejabberd 2.0.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:04:35 -0000 Shaun Amott wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Are there any plans to update the port with the latest ejabberd (2.0.0) >> version? Latest release was about 1 month ago: >> http://www.process-one.net/en/news/article/ejabberd_200_has_been_released/ >> Otherwise I'll just try to install it "by hand" :) >> > > Yes, I've been working on an update. Some dependency failed when I was > building it previously it and I didn't get around to trying again. > Hi there, is there any news on this topic? Another month has passed and yet no 2.0 in ports. What kind of dependency failure you've been experiencing? I have successfuly built 2.0 by hand without any probs. 7.0-R is on that box. I have 1.x version in production, and I can help out with testing. -- Best regards, Bogdan Culibrk bc@default.co.yu http://default.co.yu/~bc