From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 31 11:25:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA02523 for current-outgoing; Sat, 31 May 1997 11:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA02518 for ; Sat, 31 May 1997 11:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod.dataplex.net [208.2.87.4]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA08394; Sat, 31 May 1997 13:24:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: rkw@shrimp.dataplex.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <199705301253.OAA04727@sliphost37.uni-trier.de> <199705300624.IAA03466@sos.freebsd.dk> <199705300624.IAA03466@sos.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 13:23:46 -0500 To: Bob Bishop From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: ctm Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 6:49 AM -0500 5/31/97, Bob Bishop wrote: >>14 amicus-networks.Dallas.mci.net (204.70.147.70) 207 ms * 211 ms >>15 10.1.1.3 (10.1.1.3) 230 ms 187 ms 187 ms > >Eeek! Noone should be advertising a route to 10.x.x.x (see RFC1918). Try >shouting at mci.net Who says that they are advertising a route to 10.x.x.x? The advertised route is to 208.2.87.x Traceroute is getting identification of intermediate routers which happen to be on a private network. They cannot be addressed from the outside. I do not believe that this violates RFC1918.