From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 10:24:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F43106564A for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CD28FC0A for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QmNli-0002Iy-Vr for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:42 +0200 Received: from 93-139-217-171.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.139.217.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:42 +0200 Received: from gour by 93-139-217-171.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Gour-Gadadhara Dasa Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:30 +0200 Lines: 57 Message-ID: <20110728122430.2f79fcfb@atmarama.net> References: <4D767B3A.9010006@gmail.com> <4D767E37.3020403@yandex.ru> <4D79F832.9050102@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/mirsC4Es5BVkOXCqKrW199."; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-139-217-171.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-Face: 3Cy8q3pLN"sFiKpp%e^3=GTSm2xV5z:O1:| :WC~ei/w@ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:24:45 -0000 --Sig_/mirsC4Es5BVkOXCqKrW199. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:28:28 +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > No, the problem is people not following [1]. I'll fix qemu in the > morning to cover this. We were hit with the strange problem in Weechat after updating my OS yester= day (PCBSD-9.0) due to weechat & urxvt pulling devel/ncurses. (See http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=3D142192 thread:) I'm still quite new with FreeBSD and I'm not sure whether the above sentence means that weechat/urxvt port maintainers should be informed about it in or= der to fix the port to use ncurses from the base? Sincerely, Gour --=20 =E2=80=9CIn the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations=E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 --Sig_/mirsC4Es5BVkOXCqKrW199. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOMTjeAAoJELhxXPVStcgQUIgQAMnQjC9zJd/LncaLcch1pVGv /2FdeGWEv83357JY04B0GdJHOD4WMlzYC9pQM6/EiJVlRZ9w8y/xsn83if8ZXtk4 JTdqzStInER+GWwikl4P4K/ajnIy5LCFYDrRR+EBngt0nsSbQ9sDOpvBtn9zt+/O IxHtslKPHOEx26XMJjs1FsUaeTJk5qdoCH3/8BcwoTQV7PFebqr8xk5udKsHO3o+ cqCGL192yzqvbIW2MQy0Ou6X1BZ+PmzJs3dBP6dp3G8ZoC0RJUfXaBPnbiK0qWza +Vzbb9fethwQZHlYjnOTSeUwFhWqPOgVOGZIN8spcH5DOmWw1ThZ6MTWkHCw9eaX ydEDsnD0B+miwgqI4XxBpYr4tLvliXdSw5Y5dFPxWVkkFJK1bqD2YdAP2GKBXzUj YWZIFY5sumGsGFDg0qXwu1npT+lSv2JNpUJe/RhfJ92XD2M/NkeW5bmeGY5SaWpQ f4UUGcxx2B8aTCBaTD2T6q7RC01EwWhQdjl0gRpCMVqgGJ9VxwVg95b3Slg23UEb HpGvVN3Y4HEF1N4njR96jMpV4a5kUb5DiVSEommEk4n8MLI8DmNcGLiX52ygZCfs ZAxzQEUob3cd996y6TC3inIBZukxhA53L91ebBsffiUHYGze8FnEvhAcLCDEmzea NhwEk81RJSJ8Sxg6AeWx =1MT/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mirsC4Es5BVkOXCqKrW199.--