From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jun  3 19:22:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA11470
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tok.qiv.com ([204.214.141.211])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA11457
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by tok.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id VAA02246;
	Tue, 3 Jun 1997 21:21:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost)
	by acp.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA00437;
	Tue, 3 Jun 1997 21:19:15 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: acp.qiv.com: jdn owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 21:19:15 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Jay D. Nelson" <jdn@qiv.com>
To: Chris Peltier <CPELTIER@iectech.com>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Compaq Deskpro XL 6150 compatability
In-Reply-To: <97Jun3.174104edt.6204@netgate.iectech.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970603211822.435A-100000@acp.qiv.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

What happens after you disable apm?

-- Jay

On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Chris Peltier wrote:

->
->This system does have a Matrox Milenium and an integrated
->ethernet and SCSI. Is it a mess to proceed? Should it be
->left as an NT box in your opinion? 
->Disabling the unneccessary devices and probes results in a
->hang after the apm0: device. 
->>
->>
->Joshua wrote,
->
->>Also, I don't remember the models, but there are some with Millenium or
->>Mystique cards where like three periphs/"cards" share IRQ 10... without
->>the special modified NT that comes with them, you need to
->>disable/reassign some of the devices before the conflicts can be
->>reolved...
->>
->>JF
->>
->