Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:49:44 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@theravensnest.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th Message-ID: <7778270C-218B-4F23-9941-D6DBED8E054D@theravensnest.org> In-Reply-To: <5050513C.7040100@dougbarton.us> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> <20120911150356.GA87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5050513C.7040100@dougbarton.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 Sep 2012, at 10:09, Doug Barton wrote: > Also, users who actually are helping with testing clang for ports > continue to report runtime problems, even with things that build fine. I hope that you are encouraging maintainers of ports that don't work as = expected with clang to submit bug reports upstream. We can't fix bugs = if we aren't made aware of them. David Current hat: LLVM / Clang developer.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7778270C-218B-4F23-9941-D6DBED8E054D>