From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 17:21:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1731D16A508 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:21:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saturn.futuredesigns.net (saturn.futuredesigns.net [216.46.197.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CC6543D1F for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:21:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sturdee@mikesweb.com) Received: (qmail 941 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Feb 2005 17:21:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 17:21:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:21:01 -0500 (EST) From: Mike To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200502081429.19136.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20050208121945.V12287@saturn.mikesweb.com> References: <200502081429.19136.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: ULE status X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:21:04 -0000 I compiled my kernel with ULE this morning on my AMD64 workstation to help test. All seems good so far. Anything in particular to keep an eye on? -Mike On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 14:02, Mipam wrote: > >> Okay clear, but the fact that it's in 5-stable suggests the it's stable to >> use, else why would it be in 5-stable. > > The changes that have been merged to stable have been tested for some time in > 6-CURRENT, so they're not completely experimental, yes. > >> Maybe i'm completly wrong in this interpretation? > > I'm not sure what your interpretation is. If you go by your own definition > (what's in -stable should be safe to use), why do you ask at all? In any > case, the ULE MFC commits are only a few days old, so there's naturally not > much feedback available, good or bad. If you want to play it safe, wait a > week or a month and monitor this lists for complaints before trying it > yourself. > > -- > ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org > (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org > \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org > -------------------------------------- "Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, but Laziness Always Pays Off Now."