From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:34:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27C67CDF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com (st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com [17.172.220.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (112/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.me.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC4C9DD for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fukuyama.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (unknown [73.162.13.215]) by st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit (built Jun 6 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NCM000J9E1U7B40@st11p02mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:34:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-09-28_03:2014-09-26,2014-09-28,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1409280186 Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1985.4\)) Subject: Re: Digi CCWMX53 From: Rui Paulo In-reply-to: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:34:41 -0700 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1985.4) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Russell Haley X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:34:53 -0000 On Sep 28, 2014, at 00:12, Warner Losh wrote: > A spec for the NAND controller is needed to make that work=85 Is one = about? We have access to U-Boot's source code, so that could also work. -- Rui Paulo