From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 21 19:14:08 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA09798 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 19:14:08 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA09789 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 19:14:05 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA27453; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 19:11:49 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199509220211.TAA27453@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Load averages. To: nc@ai.net (Network Coordinator) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 19:11:49 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Network Coordinator" at Sep 21, 95 09:37:34 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 333 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > My question is why when a system is idle 95% of any second is it having > any load average whatsoever? Even an "idle" system has processes that are willing to run. Interrupt overhead, etc. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.