From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 14 6:58:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from raven.ravenbrook.com (raven.ravenbrook.com [193.82.131.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218F837B422 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nb@ravenbrook.com) Received: from thrush.ravenbrook.com (thrush.ravenbrook.com [193.112.141.249]) by raven.ravenbrook.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA17301 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:58:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from thrush.ravenbrook.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thrush.ravenbrook.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4EDwf658785 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:58:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nb@thrush.ravenbrook.com) From: Nick Barnes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: zero copy networking Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 14:58:41 +0100 Message-ID: <58783.989848721@thrush.ravenbrook.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just read the TCP performance paper in the latest IEEE Communications Magazine[1]. Are the kernel modifications for zero-copy networking and checksum offloading in the kernel yet? Nick B [1] "End System Optimizations for High-Speed TCP"; Chase, Galatin, Yocum; IEEE Communications Magazine; 2001-04; pp 68--74. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message