From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 26 11:45:07 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7024417;
 Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357863CAC;
 Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n3so5045280wiv.2
 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to;
 bh=oIxch9cbbMFCptoIebMxjEZ5JIlHStj7YsybYRZy45Q=;
 b=VFoiQIlMylQ08qQBI7FjwMPk6qIKEKuYxBwJV0iUFUbffpxcqteDgFru3TxljeLvD/
 +VNQiQM9IKU2sf1b2WhZWxxfol1hdylBwo4+UqltuZhpLHWOcBDtdtQHAooWQg5wFDwe
 9Tx55g8OArGKAwR+glsOV3h4H0dK73ENuwI4Lvjc90ocgwDz7FGhq/aQVeLsdeT91tEK
 JyqyxlaWJOzmIETOWDp3XFTfDzq/v1bT8N4bUUtGP5Zkj47J0TfM86TtuBBuBDKq1C6t
 cy3DBI6KsCKJkT0GvgWsfX6cYqTlfN7hFfCp4hJURVtLlBJCZnxF9SlEBv8Bs+wglbGr
 lIUA==
X-Received: by 10.180.75.17 with SMTP id y17mr21073415wiv.3.1409053505541;
 Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.20.2] ([62.219.134.104])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hf9sm1609491wib.11.2014.08.26.04.45.03
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
References: <C18F5819-A884-4A86-9FBA-FF7CEFF70695@gmail.com>
 <53FC60AB.1060805@qeng-ho.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <53FC60AB.1060805@qeng-ho.org>
Message-Id: <1EE2934C-DA78-451F-B86A-93A9C55B9C56@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPod Mail (10B500)
From: atar <atar.yosef@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: TL-WN722N support on FreeBSD.
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:45:00 +0300
To: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:45:07 -0000

Ok, I've understood the point. So probably there's no way to use this popula=
r TP-LINK dongle with FreeBSD. Very alas. Disappointed.

> On 26/08/2014 08:32, atar wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>=20
>> According to what's written in the following URLs:
> > http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?t=3D41581 ,
> > https://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath_hal(4)/HardwareSupport
> > (under the 'Chipsets I won't be working on' section) the
> > TL-WN722N TP-LINK wireless dongle isn't supported on freeBSD
> > since its chipset is based on the AR9271 chipset which isn't
> > supported by FreeBSD.
>>=20
>> Now, my question is, since the above mentioned device is supported
> > by Linux via a special atheros firmware module, and since FreeBSD
> > provides a Linux virtualization, will this device work on a FreeBSD
> > system by its Linux virtualization capability?
>=20
> I'm not familiar with the Atheros firmware, but the likely answer is no. L=
inux virtualization (probably better described as emulation) is at the user s=
pace level, i.e. it mimics the interface of Linux syscalls. Device drivers w=
ork in kernel space, and the FreeBSD kernel has very different internals fro=
m Linux.
>=20
>=20