Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 09:21:19 -0700 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot image for a Pi4 ? Message-ID: <ZorAf6SQcEhPJ4eR@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <8191F304-613E-4017-A256-9A850D59A40D@yahoo.com> References: <ZodKuUM2aLIX_y3L@www.zefox.net> <687ABF28-5346-464E-8BBD-E2E9E12F8EC3@yahoo.com> <Zog7NoVhshfSTN0Z@www.zefox.net> <8191F304-613E-4017-A256-9A850D59A40D@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 09:38:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > The RPi4B Rev 1.5 "C0T" wtih 8 GiBytes also lists 2018. > > Capture the early serial console output from the > RPi* bootloader and firmware and look for lines > that contain one of (showing a 8 GiByte Rev 1.5 > example: d03115): > > boardrev d03115 > 0x00d03115 > RPI 4 Model B (0xd03115) > > That last is actually from U-Boot. > The first was toward the end of the "BOOTMODE:" line. > The middle was the line after the "Read fixup4.dat bytes" line. > > By contrast a 4GiByte Rev 1.1 has for those lines: > > boardrev c03111 > 0x00c03111 > RPI 4 Model B (0xc03111) U-boot reports RPI 4 Model B (0xd03114) on both machines (8GB). Couldn't find the other output. Is the COT vs BOT difference still significant? Thanks for writing! bob prohaska
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZorAf6SQcEhPJ4eR>