From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 11 04:50:58 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA28831 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 04:50:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shale.csir.co.za (shale.csir.co.za [146.64.46.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA28825 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 04:50:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reg@shale.csir.co.za) Received: (from reg@localhost) by shale.csir.co.za (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA51342; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:49:06 +0200 (SAT) (envelope-from reg) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:49:06 +0200 From: Jeremy Lea To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: State of the union, 1999. Message-ID: <19990111144906.A3187@shale.csir.co.za> References: <49859.915950870@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <49859.915950870@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 10:47:50PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 10:47:50PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Release numbering: Probably already covered, but I wanted to say that you should make a big deal of this when it comes to people following branches. If people think that the 3.0->3.1 jump is the same as say the 2.1->2.2 jump, then there will be a big demand for a larger number of -stable branches. So you need to make them aware that there will now be one -stable branch for each major number. Is the new tag going to be RELENG_3? Regards, -Jeremy PS Why didn't you go for FreeBSD'99? :-) -- | "Come home my prodigal son, come home and lets be one, --+-- don't want to see you cry, don't make me tell you why, | you've lived in a house with me, my blood has set you free, | in the world you'll surely die, nothing else will satisfy." -MIC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message