From owner-freebsd-chat  Fri Jul 19 17:52:41 1996
Return-Path: owner-chat
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA29656
          for chat-outgoing; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA29604;
          Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA04766; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607200051.RAA04766@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: "Marty Leisner" <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
cc: "Craig Shaver" <craig@ProGroup.COM>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org,
        current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Opinions? NT VS UNIX, NT SUCKS SOMETIMES 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:27:41 PDT."
             <9607200027.AA14374@gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:51:11 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


While working at M/Cast a couple of months ago, Win95 tended to
crash oh about 5 to 10 times a day  during development of the
multimedia apps.

A bad transceiver brought to its knees all the Win95 PCs. The sun
boxes and the FreeBSD seemed to happily continue working.

I guess if you don't use Win95 for development is an okay platform.

	Amancio