Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:44:54 -0500 From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> To: Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> Subject: Re: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade Message-ID: <4A2BD6D5-A1AD-443C-A7C5-EBD37DDDDCCC@netgate.com> In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2Bogbr4NyAHLTKuiywgyU9apJj8Wg=wVk%2BpRJn_cM_Wv2_=A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEW%2BogZD8ZKJJr1X8-OU3MwYx1hObskXq4gFeEBNJECjPdzZLw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogYmHO3Jn7k3AYkFG-jZdaaHWTT40qu3Of1u%2BGH4yHmA1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogZ0e3z=VMt14MH7Yv-aRBdryi8y=Mn3=LApAGT=fx-KZQ@mail.gmail.com> <B5D24D4D-68BA-4479-8FD2-8B3775055C04@jnielsen.net> <15AC566F-82AD-4F76-9710-67669D344F4D@netgate.com> <CAEW%2Bogbr4NyAHLTKuiywgyU9apJj8Wg=wVk%2BpRJn_cM_Wv2_=A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
VALE is in 10.3, the netmap backend: IDK. It's in pfSense 2.3 (based on 10.3= ).=20 -- Jim > On Mar 22, 2016, at 8:44 AM, Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > is it builtin already in 10.3? or in current only? >=20 > =D7=91=D7=AA=D7=90=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9A 19 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=A8=D7=A5 2016 18:5= 5,=E2=80=8F "Jim Thompson" <jim@netgate.com> =D7=9B=D7=AA=D7=91: >>=20 >> > On Mar 19, 2016, at 10:55 AM, John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> wrote: >> > >> >> On Mar 19, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> hi, >> >> are there ongoing job on taking bhyve further steps toward enterprise s= cale >> >> like: >> >> 1. high availability, rules on vms (like affinity rules in vmware: eg a= n >> >> app vm and sql vm go together...), vmotion... >> >> 2. network virtualization like vmware nsx... >> > >> > The wiki pages probably the best place for general info on bhyve curren= t and planned features: https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve >> > >> > Live migration is a planned feature. HA rules and other automation and o= rchestration are probably beyond the scope of what bhyve itself is aiming to= achieve, though such features could easily be provided by additional script= s and tools. >> > >> > What specifically are you after in terms of network virtualization? Aga= in, bhyve itself isn't intended to be a giant umbrella but FreeBSD does supp= ort many networking features which could support network virtualization (and= which work fine with bhyve). >>=20 >> VALE is built-in to FreeBSD, and with the new netmap back-end for bhyve, s= erves as a good =E2=80=98base=E2=80=99 for a vswitch. >>=20 >> Jim >>=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A2BD6D5-A1AD-443C-A7C5-EBD37DDDDCCC>