From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 23 13:38:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA01559 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 13:38:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA01537 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 13:38:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: (from hasty@localhost) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA23308; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 13:38:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 13:38:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Amancio Hasty Message-Id: <199806232038.NAA23308@rah.star-gate.com> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com Subject: Re: option MROUTING Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <7005.898633960@time.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The question of mbone capable PC Unix systems keeps coming up on the mbone mailing list. Linux is a little bit behind however it is catching to FreeBSD in terms of mbone and audio /video conferencing tools . The first step for wider MBONE deployment is for the PCs whether they run Unix or WinXX is for them to be MBONE capable by clueless users . The server side (mrouted) you are correct in that the users usually have the sufficient expertise however on the client side it is an entirely different matter. Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message