From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 17:22:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37DE16A4FE; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:22:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (eastrmmtao01.cox.net [68.230.240.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13B643E9B; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:15:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061215171641.HVDB20860.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:16:41 -0500 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id z5FW1V0074iy4EG0000000; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:15:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:18:05 -0600 To: "Andrew Reilly" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061214085727.15bf3750@duncan.reilly.home> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20061214085727.15bf3750@duncan.reilly.home> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (Linux) Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to compile nautilus with debug symbols from ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:22:43 -0000 On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:57:27 -0600, Andrew Reilly = wrote: > Hi there, > > I had nautilus crash on me, the other day. I think that I can > repeat the crash: well, it's happened twice, doing the same thing > (attempting a VFS mount of a file share from a Windows laptop > that requires authentication). So I installed bugbuddy so that > it could phone home to the GNOME folks to tell them what was up, > but although the _process_ seems to have worked, and a bug > registered, it wasn't able to find a core dump, and the core dump > wouldn't have had much useful symbolic info, anyway. > > So: what's happened to nautilus' .core file? Is there some fancy > clean-up mechanism going on? I imagine so: that must be how > bugbuddy gets invoked in the first place. Can this be overriden > so that I can get a core file to point gdb at? > > Secondly: is there a convenient port-build global knob for > turning on debugging symbols? Anything more complicated than > CFLAGS+=3D-g in /etc/make.conf? See in http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html#q3 for what to pu= t = in make.conf. Cheers, Mezz > Cheers, -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org