From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 11:45:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1933616A420 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:45:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackt123@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F0243D45 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:45:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jackt123@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i29so714368wxd for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:45:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FJWHxselWW0VEENMgK6D+s94X+iyyfV9g1hbwKg3q55O6ANRK3FRpQtgARBQ9IR2Wab49HufFrLGq6bqCgt8fR0kLXqy8NFKt4r1D39fa4LfNXtHxIHNHoal1oEApXPEabN44+g5x6Hh5NtFRXAI5wxiTSfbA0OUdruGuMZpzyQ= Received: by 10.70.78.14 with SMTP id a14mr509759wxb; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:45:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.70.16 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:45:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:45:21 +0000 From: "Jack T" To: "Marius Nuennerich" In-Reply-To: <20060228024303.6f164e6a@sol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060228024303.6f164e6a@sol> Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GELI compatibility with GBDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:45:22 -0000 On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 Jack T wrote: > Hi all. Sorry if this is a FAQ (I googled but > am still unsure of the answer, and in any case > there's too much to risk if I got it wrong) > My question is: can GELI access > a partition that was encrypted by GBDE? On 2/28/06, Marius Nuennerich wrote: > I don't think so, why should it? Hi! I was looking at feature comparison charts. GBDE uses AES, GELI can uses AES, Blowfish, and 3DES. GBDE uses fixed key length, GELI can be variable. Since they both can do sector-by-sector encryption, and GELI can be configured to use the same scheme and key length as GBDE, I just thought maybe it would be great if they're compatible. (I have a lot of data encrypted using GBDE, and it would be a lot of work to re-encrypt them with GELI to get the ability to enter keyphrase in kernel space rather than userspace, so that I can encrypt the root filesystem which GBDE can't do) Thanks! - Jack T