From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Oct 11 15:02:28 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B574210BD85F for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [IPv6:2001:19f0:300:2185:a:dead:bad:faff]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B01173FF1 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [104.207.135.49]) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w9BF2LdA006759; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:02:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id w9BF2FY7006750; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:02:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <201810111502.w9BF2FY7006750@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:02:15 +0100 Organization: Dyslexic Fish To: imb@protected-networks.net, freebsd.current@clogic.com.ua Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: OpenSSL 1.1.1 in 12.0 References: <20181009213425.GG61558@FreeBSD.org> <346b8805-f4d3-dc90-c882-d72f640b6a5c@protected-networks.net> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:02:28 -0000 freebsd.current@clogic.com.ua wrote: > Anyway, I think apps from ports need to use openssl from ports. No. Only if it's installed. If not, it's perfectly normal for a port to use the base openssl - it's not a private-lib install. cheers, Jamie