From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 21 11:15:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.osd.bsdi.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E070637B865 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:15:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12086; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:15:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com) To: Boris Popov Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" , kit , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: smbfs second mount In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:34:34 +0700." Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:15:12 -0700 Message-ID: <12083.961611312@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think it should *definitely* be in the base system. :) > On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, are there any plans to commit the smbfs stuff? It is > > really useful and I'd love to see it in the base system. > > Yes, I'm get much more responses about smbfs compared to nwfs. So, > probably it should be in the base system. > > -- > Boris Popov > http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message