From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 10:16:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CC116A41F; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:16:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E28243D48; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411EAF24B8; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:16:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00823-08; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:16:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.mcneil.com (server.mcneil.com [10.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931CAF2453; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:16:11 -0800 (PST) From: Sean McNeil To: Alexander Nedotsukov In-Reply-To: <437052E9.2040004@FreeBSD.org> References: <1126680998.14844.2.camel@localhost> <4327DBC7.2090707@ebs.gr> <1127115472.1082.15.camel@localhost> <432E6E1B.8020108@ebs.gr> <1127129214.997.5.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> <1131402336.1264.6.camel@localhost> <437052E9.2040004@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-5 Organization: Sean McNeil Consulting, Inc Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:16:11 -0800 Message-Id: <1131444971.69134.5.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com Cc: eclipse@FreeBSD.org, Vladimir Grebenschikov , gnome Subject: Re: Failed to build eclipse with gnome 2.12 (failed on cario) X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sean@mcneil.com List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:16:13 -0000 On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:25 +0900, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > В пн, 19/09/2005 в 13:26 +0200, Andreas Kohn пишет: > > > >> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 10:51 +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > >> > >>> Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > >>> > >>>> В ср, 14/09/2005 в 11:13 +0300, Panagiotis Astithas пишет: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> This seems to be caused by the updated cairo 1.0.0 in gnome 2.12. > >>>>> Eclipse 3.1 depends on cairo 0.4 and cairo has changed its ABI > >>>>> afterwards. I think Eclipse 3.2M1 has been updated for cairo 0.6, which > >>>>> should be ABI-compatible to cairo 1.0.0, according to this: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=106527 > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> We could use the patches for 3.1 in that report, > >>>>> > >>>> I've tried, but it is not applied cleanly from first try. Patch is big > >>>> enough. > >>>> Do you have any estimation about eclipse-3.2M1 getting into ports tree ? > >>>> > >>> Well, to be honest, I was planning to port the first milestone that will > >>> have our submitted patches merged. If that seems to take forever though > >>> and we can't use eclipse at all with a current gnome, I'll certainly > >>> reconsider. > >>> > >> FWIW, you can find a patch to eclipse that I use for 3.1+gnome 2.12 at > >> http://andreas.syndrom23.de/dump/eclipse-3.1-cairo.diff > >> > > > > Any chance to get this patch commited ? > > java/eclipse still does not build with gnome-2.12 (already in tree). > > > I did this yesterday. Cvsup. One caveat (as mentioned on another thread) - The patches incorporated only fix the problem for x86. amd64 systems still fail to build properly. Cheers, Sean