From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 17 16:16:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA14758 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 16:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from riverside.mr.net (root@Riverside.MR.Net [137.192.2.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA14616 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 16:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from data.mr.net (root@data.MR.Net [137.192.192.27]) by riverside.mr.net (8.8.5/) with ESMTP id SAA20592 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 18:14:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from data (fritchie@data.MR.Net [137.192.192.27]) by data.mr.net (8.8.5/8.7.2) with ESMTP id SAA15533 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 18:14:19 -0500 (CDT); Df=fritchie@data.mr.net, Dg=fritchie@data.mr.net, Dq=, Dx=Scott Fritchie Message-Id: <199706172314.SAA15533@data.mr.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: SCO emulation + Legato NetWorker SCO client? Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 18:14:18 -0500 From: Scott Lystig Fritchie Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Outta curiousity ... anyone using the SCO emulation to run the SCO NetWorker client? I'd wager that it works: if SCO WordPerfect runs well, I can't imagine the NetWorker client wouldn't. The NetWorker client isn't much more filesystem-intrusive than 'tar' is. -Scott --- Scott Lystig Fritchie, Senior Systems Administrator MRNet Internet Services, Inc. Minnesota Regional Network fritchie@mr.net, PGP key #152B8725 2829 University Ave SE v: 612/362.5820, p: 612/637.9547 Minneapolis, MN 55414