From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 18 19:05:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA29341
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:05:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu (qmailr@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu [146.186.218.51])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA29325
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:05:00 -0800 (PST)
From: tenser@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu
Received: (qmail 29295 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Mar 1997 03:04:37 -0000
Date: 19 Mar 1997 03:04:37 -0000
Message-ID: <19970319030437.29294.qmail@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: X11 under 2.2-RELEASE?
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hmm, is it just me, or are the versions of xterm and xdm shipped with
2.2-RELEASE still slightly skewed with respect to utmp?

: krusty 6; w
10:04PM  up  2:48, 3 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.08, 0.33
USER     TTY FROM              LOGIN@  IDLE WHAT
tad      v0  -                 7:16PM  2:47 xinit --
tenser   p1  spitfire.ecsel.p 10:02PM     - w
ttyp0        tad              13Aug95  2:47 -
: krusty 7; 

I don't think that ttyp0 is a valid user.  :-)  Then again, this
could be a different bug just now rearing it's ugly head, or krusty
might be slightly messed up.

If I'm missing something obvious here, please throw a slap upside
the grape my way.  :-)

	- Dan C.