From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 17 08:28:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA14340
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 08:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA14329
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 08:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from imb@localhost)
          by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.7.5/BSD4.4) id BAA25613
          Thu, 18 Apr 1996 01:26:59 +1000 (EST)
From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199604171526.BAA25613@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
Subject: Re: ip-in-ip tunnel
To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 01:26:56 +1000 (EST)
Cc: dirk@methan.chemie.fu-berlin.de, hackers@freebsd.org,
        xadmin@methan.chemie.fu-berlin.de, alf@bolzen.in-berlin.de
In-Reply-To: <199604171236.WAA09223@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Apr 17, 96 10:06:46 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Dirk Froemberg stands accused of saying:
> > 
> > Another approach might be to create a interface doing the encapsulation.
> > The implementation of the ip-in-ip-encapsulation itself is not very
> > difficult. At the moment we are a stucked "a little bit" in the
> > BSD-networking-code.

Michael Smith writes:
 
> Write a small program that talks to the 'tun' device and sends/receives 
> IP datagrams.
 
For an aging example of how you can do this, see wampes, a HAM radio package
on ftp.ucsd.edu (from memory) or its mirrors .. somewhere 'round the packet
radio dept.,

	michael