From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Oct  1  9:35:25 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1696E14C8A; Fri,  1 Oct 1999 09:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com)
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by misha.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA43945;
	Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:35:12 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi)
Message-Id: <199910011635.MAA43945@misha.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: bin/14066: use of ssh2 as CVS_RSH breaks commiting
In-Reply-To: <19991001181716.G79506@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> from Ruslan Ermilov
 at "Oct 1, 1999 06:17:16 pm"
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:35:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Ruslan Ermilov once wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:07:05AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > Sheldon Hearn once stated:
> > 
> > =On Fri, 01 Oct 1999 09:07:14 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > =
> > => Why are you  so sure it is ssh's problem?  Just because this does
> > => not happen with rsh?
> > =
> > =It doesn't happen with ssh1 either.
> > 
> > It is still worth investigating further, I believe...
> > 
> Feel free to.

Why   don't  you   just  say,   that   PRs  without   patches  are   NOT
accepted?  And  spare  the   discussions?  This  problem  involves  part
of  the  FreeBSD  (/usr/bin/cvs)   interacting  with  the  FreeBSD  port
(/usr/ports/security/ssh2). Yet, FreeBSD team  refuses to aknowledge the
problem has anything  to do with FreeBSD  -- the PR was  closed the next
day without much investigation.

	-mi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message