From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 00:45:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A274C16A4CE for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 00:45:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from web14101.mail.yahoo.com (web14101.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 285C043D5C for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 00:44:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cguttesen@yahoo.dk) Message-ID: <20040206084458.53207.qmail@web14101.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.248.174.58] by web14101.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:44:58 CET Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:44:58 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Claus=20Guttesen?= To: Peter Jeremy , Harald Schmalzbauer In-Reply-To: <20040206072244.GT908@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Reserved space (WAS: How to calculate bsdlabel size) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:45:02 -0000 >> But it's not my problem. What you mean results in >> limited available space, >> but doesn't have any influence on Size summary. >> Btw I did a newfs with -m 0 >> so it can't be the reaseon. > > This is strongly non-recommended. The UFS > algorithms are designed on > the assumption that there are always free blocks. > When you get below > 5-10% free space, the performance will degrade > significantly and you > will start getting file fragmentation. > Does the algorithm(s) rely only on percentage of free space? On a five TB (netto) filesystem eigth percent is approx. 410 GB which seems quite alot. regards Claus Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og virusscan