From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 07:27:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6D016A53E; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from corb.mc.mpls.visi.com (corb.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D228743FFB; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:27:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawkeyd@visi.com) Received: from sheol.localdomain (hawkeyd-fw.dsl.visi.com [208.42.101.193]) by corb.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D4581B8; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:27:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from hawkeyd@localhost) by sheol.localdomain (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) id h8OERI009056; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:27:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hawkeyd) X-Spam-Policy: http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/index.html#mail Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:27:17 -0500 From: D J Hawkey Jr To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Message-ID: <20030924142717.GA9026@sheol.localdomain> References: <3F705D4D.4070404@tenebras.com> <20030923205318.GB3346@scylla.towardex.com> <20030924091603.GC22622@starjuice.net> <20030924142015.GC57288@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030924142015.GC57288@madman.celabo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH: multiple vulnerabilities in the new PAM code X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hawkeyd@visi.com List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:27:30 -0000 On Sep 24, at 09:20 AM, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On (2003/09/23 16:53), Haesu wrote: > > > > > Oh jee, here we go again. Hey, at least patched 3.5p1 on FreeBSD > > > 4.8/4.9 are not effected :) > > > > Since -CURRENT's using a modified OpenSSH_3.6.1p1, I don't think this > > issue affects FreeBSD at all. > > Unfortunately, it _does_ affect us. The PAM code in OpenSSH 3.7x was > taken from FreeBSD's PAM code. des@ is working the issue now. But just "portable", right? Or are any "core" OpenSSHes across various FreeBSD releases also vulnerable? Thanks, Dave -- ______________________ ______________________ \__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/ \________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/ http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/