From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 19 19:11:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A63106564A for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gallasch@free.de) Received: from smtp.free.de (smtp.free.de [91.204.6.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EDF8FC1C for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44084 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2012 21:11:06 +0200 Received: from smtp.free.de (HELO orwell.free.de) (gallasch@free.de@[91.204.4.103]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.free.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Apr 2012 21:11:06 +0200 From: Kai Gallasch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:11:06 +0200 Message-Id: To: freebsd-stable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: FreeBSD 9.0 - BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT kernel option for bce device still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:11:08 -0000 Hi. I found the comment below in an older 8.1 kernel config file. # BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT # freebsd-current@freebsd.org/2009-11/msg00065.html # [The bce driver does not have a memory leak, # it does however have a bug which causes memory # fragmentation leading to denied mbuf allocation.] #=3D20 # You need to put "options BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT" # In your kernel to enable the work arround. Is the kernel option BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT still needed for a FreeBSD 9 = kernel if you use the bce device (broadcom) ? I find it in the 9.0 kernel LINT file but it's not part of the GENERIC = kernel. Kai.=