Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:47:48 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> To: David Southwell <david@vizion2000.net> Cc: Dima Panov <Fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru>, kuriyama@FreeBSD.org, rse@gnu.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/gnupg installing pth-2.0.7 causing problems Message-ID: <48acff730911121547l7c7e9af9p9518a6603882d04a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200911081549.06930.david@vizion2000.net> References: <E28FFB752F43478A951BFAF0F00E40FE@sleuth64> <200911081017.19182.david@vizion2000.net> <48acff730911080651r5ced86a0m93c2ce4fb3d815c6@mail.gmail.com> <200911081549.06930.david@vizion2000.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/11/9 David Southwell <david@vizion2000.net>:
>> 2009/11/8 David Southwell <david@vizion2000.net>:
> What puzzles me is why the gnupg maintainer is sooooooooo reluctant to pr=
ovide
> alternative options to using pth when there are both system libraries and
> libpthread-stubs-0.1 available as an alternative. =A0Dependencuy upon
> libpthread-stubs-0.1 enables gnupg to function without causing unnecessar=
y
> problems. My understand is the pth was written for those systems which do=
not
> have alternative =A0libraries for handling threads.
My understanding is, stock gnupg dist depends on pth (even if
described as optional).
It seems using libpthread-stubs needs to modify configure script. Do you h=
ave a
patch for this?
--=20
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
<kuriyama@s2factory.co.jp> // S2 Factory, Inc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48acff730911121547l7c7e9af9p9518a6603882d04a>