From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 19 14:14:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA20300 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:14:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA20295 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:14:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA00311; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdsHR297; Mon Oct 19 21:12:13 1998 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:12:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Nate Williams cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vote:? reversion of BDE change please? In-Reply-To: <199810192050.OAA00042@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG True, but till that happens automatic mechanisms are broken! he could have just left them in ioconf.h till they were not needed at all and then deleted them from there, rather than break ioconf.c. On Mon, 19 Oct 1998, Nate Williams wrote: > > Please, if you know why I should not do this (or can lend weight > > as to why I should) let me know! > > Because the interrupt mechanism need to become less ISA/x86 centric. > > > Nate > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message