From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug 24 20:35:20 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from newton.math.uic.edu (newton.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F41D6152A6
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 20:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from vladimir@math.uic.edu)
Received: (qmail 10808 invoked from network); 25 Aug 1999 03:35:13 -0000
Received: from galois.math.uic.edu (HELO math.uic.edu) (131.193.178.114)
  by newton.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 25 Aug 1999 03:35:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 26003 invoked by uid 31415); 25 Aug 1999 03:35:10 -0000
Date: 25 Aug 1999 03:35:10 -0000
Message-ID: <19990825033510.26002.qmail@math.uic.edu>
From: vladimir@math.uic.edu
To: bright@rush.net
Subject: Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


	>From bright@rush.net Wed Aug 25 01:11:10 1999
	>Delivered-To: vladimir@mailhost2.math.uic.edu
	>Delivered-To: vladimir@math.uic.edu
	>Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:21:27 -0400 (EDT)
	>From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>
	>To: vladimir@math.uic.edu
	>cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
	>Subject: Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris
	>MIME-Version: 1.0
	>
	>On 24 Aug 1999 vladimir@math.uic.edu wrote:
	>
	>> Following advice from Cejka Rudolf <cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz>, I have edited
	>> /src/sys/nfs/nfs_syscalls.c (commented out the lines after the "Solaris 2.5" 
	>> comment).     The "File exists"  errors went away, everything seemed normal,
	>> but then I ran into another problem.   mailx on solaris
	>> client could not lock the mailbox file anymore.   The snoop output is
	>> below (I am not an NFS guru, but hope it will be useful to somebody).   
	>> Here galileo is the FBSD server, galois is a Solaris 7 NFS client.   
	>> Why would solaris machine make a request with vers=4:
	>> galois.math.uic.edu -> galileo.math.uic.edu PORTMAP C GETPORT prog=100021 (NLM) vers=4 proto=UDP
	>> ?
	>> (am I right that vers here is the same as the NFS version)?   
	>
	>The NLM version 4 protocol is not supported, I am working on this.
	>
	>Question: did you delete both checks after the Solaris 2.5 mention?
	>or just one?  which one?
	>
	>-Alfred
	>
	>

Ah, so vers=4 has nothing to do with NFS's vers 3.

I have deleted both checks.

Please let me know if you need more info or testing done.

	Vladimir



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message