Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 13:31:35 -0800 (PST) From: Dave Babler <dbabler@Rigel.orionsys.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wwwcount-2.3 Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961110132533.15944A-100000@Rigel.orionsys.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.961109224225.8618B-100000@packet.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 Nov 1996, Chuck Robey wrote: > > I've checked, and if everyone running 2.1 and 2.1.5 would grab a copy of > current's bsd.port.mk, it has no negative impact, and will eliminate the > majority of build failures for new ports. There are a small subset of > ports that depend on differences in /usr/include and whatnot, but that's a > real small subset. > > Good Advice: update your bsd.port.mk file in /usr/share/mk. > I'm running 2.1.5-stable and just grabbed the bsd.port.mk file for -current. I'd had problems before making the slang-lynx (2.6) port and was informed that the ports collection now only applied to -current. The mak breaks in exactly the same place as it used to - it cannot apply any of the patches. Is this port of lynx one of the real small subset, or is something else hosed here? -Dave
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.961110132533.15944A-100000>