From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 8 07:46:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DFA1065673; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 07:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67C38FC0A; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 07:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q687k4TK001564; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 09:46:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q687k45T001561; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 09:46:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 09:46:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Garrett Wollman In-Reply-To: <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Message-ID: References: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 08 Jul 2012 09:46:05 +0200 (CEST) Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Doug Barton , FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:46:19 -0000 >> what integration are you concerned about? > > The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only > user-visible interfaces I care about. I don't see any need for there > to be an authoritative name server in the base system. So long as the > resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation.... fully agree. i don't see a real reason to have named in base system.